INVESTMENT SERVICES & CAPITAL MARKETS

MIFID / MIFIR
ESMA highlights areas for improvement in firms’ disclosure of cost and charges under MIFID
On 6 July 2023, ESMA published a Statement on its 2022 Common Supervisory Action (CSA) and on the mystery shopping exercise regarding compliance with disclosure requirements for costs and charges under MIFID II.
Overall, firms comply with most of the elements of the ex-post cost and charges requirements under MIFID II. This level of compliance varies across Member States. The CSA exercise revealed certain shortcomings in information provided to retail clients and suggests areas for improvement regarding both disclosure format and content.
The identified shortcomings concern:
- significant differences across firms and Member States in the format and content of ex-post disclosures
- differing practices and sometimes no disclosureof information on inducements
- lack of disclosure of implicit costs to clients
- lack of consistency in the way firms illustrate the cumulative impact of the costs and charges on the return of the investment
- disclosing cost figures only in nominal amounts and not also the corresponding percentages
Concurrently with the CSA, ESMA coordinated and ran its first mystery shopping exercise on the ex-ante cost and charges information provided to retail clients. In most cases, mystery shoppers received information about costs and charges before the investment service was provided, however the quality and the timing of the information provided differed between firms.
Based on the insights from the CSA and the mystery shopping exercise, ESMA will focus its convergence efforts on the review and development of new Q&As and work on a possible standardised EU format for the provision of information about costs and charges to clients. Where required, National Competent Authorities (NCAs) will undertake follow-up actions on individual cases that involve regulatory breaches as well as other shortcomings.
ESMA report on sanctions and measures imposed under MIFID II in 2022
On 7 July 2023, ESMA published a report providing an overview of the applicable legal framework and the sanctions and measures imposed by National Competent Authorities (NCAs) under the MIFID II framework in 2022.
The data reported for 2022, shows that NCAs’ activity on imposing sanctions and measures under MIFID II has decreased compared to the previous year. At the same time, both the number of Member States where sanctions and measures were applied and the total amount of imposed administrative fines have increased in 2022 in comparison to 2021.
However, ESMA notes that this increased total amount of imposed administrative fines should be read cautiously, since this value includes some rather high fines imposed only by a few NCAs. Moreover, the observed decrease of the total number of NCAs’ imposed sanctions and measures (in 2022 compared to 2021) may be attributed to, inter alia, an enhanced common understanding of enforcement and sanctioning powers amongst NCAs, assisted by ESMA’s and NCAs’ methodological work to harmonise the concept of sanctions and measures.
Overall, in 25 (out of 30) EU/EEA Member States, NCAs imposed a total of 281 sanctions and measures in 2022. Those applied sanctions and measures were of an aggregated value of EUR 21,034,117.
New Manual on post-trade transparency available
On 10 July 2023, ESMA published its Manual on post-trade transparency under MiFID II/ MiFIR. As a user-friendly tool for post-trade transparency and transparency calculations, this manual provides market participants and national competent authorities with guidance for how to apply the relevant MIFIR obligations in a consistent manner.
With an aim to provide clarity amongst the large scope of instruments covered under MIFIR and the complexity of the system, this Manual covers:
- which instruments and transactions are subject to post-trade transparency;
- who has to report and publish post-trade transparency information;
- when post-trade information has to be made public: real-time vs deferred;
- which post-trade information has to be made public: reporting fields and flags; and
- the common aspects as well as the differences between the post-trade transparency regime and the transparency calculations in relation to the scope of instruments and transactions.
The Manual is the main document of a package that also consists of:
- the Final Report on the public consultation on the additional Level 3 guidance on RTS 1 and 2 integrated into the Manual, published today;
- the updated version CFI code – MIFIR identifier mapping;
- a new excel file where the classification of bonds issued by certain public bodies is clarified, and
- the updated Q&A on MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics – the version of this document reflecting the integration of certain Q&As into the Manual will be published in October 2023; until then, the guidance in the Manual prevails on that of the Q&As indicated to have been integrated in the Manual itself.
The Manual will be updated on a regular basis when further guidance is necessary or legal and legislative changes occur. The Manual will also be updated following the review of MIFIR and the revision of its relevant Level 2.
ESMA publishes Final Report on revised technical standards for passporting
On 11 July 2023, ESMA published its Final Report on the review of the technical standards for passporting under Article 34 of MIFID II.
ESMA’s proposals include targeted amendments to the existing RTS and ITS that would add new information requirements to the list of details investment firms have to provide at the passporting stage.
A new investment services and activities passport notification will also provide National Competent Authorities (NCAs) with additional information on a firm’s planned or existing cross-border activities. ESMA and the NCAs observe a continued increase in cross-border activities provided to retail clients by investment firms across the EU.
This has clear benefits for consumers and investment firms, as it fosters competition, and increases the investment options available to retail investors. Cross-border activities also require NCAs to increase their supervisory focus and cooperation efforts as there is a risk of undermining investors’ trust which, in the long term, has the potential to hamper the development of the single market.
ESMA has submitted the Final Report to the European Commission and will provide further advice and technical guidance should the European Commission decide to proceed with the review.
ESMA updates its guidance on the definition of advice in a supervisory briefing
On 11 July 2023, ESMA published a supervisory briefing on understanding the definition of advice under MIFID II.
ESMA reviewed and updated the CESR Q&A on Understanding the Definition of Advice under MIFID, a document that is widely used by supervisors and firms, to align it with new business models and recent technological developments.
The Q&A document is issued in the format of a supervisory briefing and intended for use by the National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in their supervisory activities.
The supervisory briefing, among other topics, covers:
- The provision of personal recommendations and whether other forms of information could constitute investment advice;
- Guidance on when recommendations will be viewed as based on a view of a person’s circumstances;
- Perimeter issues around the definition of personal recommendation;
- Issues around the form of communication, including use of social media posts.
The document is also intended to provide guidance to firms.
ESMA and NCAs will continue monitoring the application of the MIFID II requirements and to make sure that investment services continue to be provided in the best interest of the client.
ESMA issues Opinion on CNMV product intervention measures
On 11 July 2023, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued an Opinion on product intervention measures taken by the Spanish Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV).
The measures consist of two elements. First, further restrictions on the marketing of CFDs, including the advertisement of CFDs to the public. Second, the introduction of initial margin and margin close out requirements to products where the investor may lose more than initially invested.
The CNMV’s new national measures only apply to entities authorised to provide investment services in Spain, regardless of the origin of the entity and whether it has a branch in Spain. Via its Opinion, ESMA notes that the proposed marketing restrictions go beyond the ones taken first by ESMA in 2018 and subsequently by all NCAs. The CNMV informed ESMA that the national measures are expected to take effect on 20 July 2023.
ESMA details, within its Opinion, that the CNMV’s proposed measures are justified and proportionate. In the Opinion, ESMA encourages NCAs to monitor the marketing, sale, and distribution of CFDs and the impact of other high-risk products in their national markets to assess whether similar risks for retail investors as those identified by the CNMV exist.
ESMA highlights risks arising from securities lending to retail investors
On 12 July 2023, ESMA published a Statement on securities lending to retail clients setting out the applicable requirements under MIFID II.
The Statement highlights investor protection concerns related to securities lending and outlines the obligations of firms engaging in this practice. It also outlines ESMA’s expectations for firms’ compliance with the relevant MIFID II requirements regarding:
- Revenues from securities lending should directly accrue to the retail client, net of a normal compensation for the firm’s services
- Express prior consent of retail clients should not be sought by way of the firm’s general terms and conditions
ESMA will continue to monitor the practice of securities lending to retail clients and, if needed, issue further technical advice to the European Commission on this topic.
National regulators strengthen their supervision of the compliance function
On 13 July 2023, ESMA published its follow-up report to the peer review on certain aspects of the compliance function under MIFID I.
The report shows that, overall, the National Competent Authorities (NCAs) assessed improved their practices following the 2017 peer reviews findings and recommendations.
The NCAs included in this follow-up report – CySEC (CY), HCMC (EL), CBI (IS), AFM (NL) and ATVP (SI) – have made progress by strengthening their supervisory frameworks, undertaking investigations and thematic reviews and making use of their enforcement tools to deter poor behaviour by firms.
Two NCAs, CySEC and CBI, are encouraged to continue this process in the following manner:
- CySEC should consolidate its supervisory approach to ensure ongoing supervisory focus on firms’ compliance function
- CBI should structurally integrate all elements of the ESMA Guidelines on the compliance function under MiFID into its supervisory approach and increase its controls on the compliance function of non-banking investment for firms.
As the compliance function remains a key element to promote sound and compliant behaviour by firms, all NCAs should continue monitoring the effective application of the Guidelines and the effectiveness of the supervisory practices implemented, taking supervisory action when needed.
Official translations of ESMA guidelines on product governance under MIFID II
On 3 August 2023, ESMA published the official translations of the MIFID II guidelines on product governance requirements.
The aim of the guidelines is to strengthen investor protection and ensure that firms act in their clients’ best interests during all stages of a product’s life cycle. The guidelines shall apply from 3 October 2023, two months from the date of the publication of the official translations.
Market Abuse
ESMA does not find evidence to ban pre-hedging but warns on risks
On 12 July 2023, ESMA releasing the Final Report on the feedback received to the 2022 Call for Evidence on pre-hedging.
ESMA concludes that pre-hedging is a voluntary market practice which might give rise to conflicts of interest or abusive behaviours. Whereas ESMA does not find arguments to ban this practice at this stage, it also flags that these risks should be considered when issuing any future guidance.
ESMA committed to provide guidance on pre-hedging in the Final Report on the Market Abuse Regulation review.
ESMA will promote and contribute to the development of global regulatory principles applicable to pre-hedging. Those principles could serve as a basis for the development of any future ESMA guidance.
ESMA publishes Report on Suspicious Transactions and Order Reports
On 17 July 2023, ESMA published a Report on Suspicious Transactions and Order Reports (STORs).
The report provides an overview of how STORs are used across different jurisdictions in the context of the detection and investigation of market abuse, and how their use has evolved over time.
ESMA experts looked at various metrics such as:
- the number of STORs and other notifications received by NCAs;
- the source of these notifications;
- the breakdown per instrument type and type of violation; and
- the number of STORs provided to and received from other Competent Authorities (both within and outside the EEA).
The report covers mainly 2021 and 2022.
ESMA continues to monitor STORs and may issue an updated report next year covering 2023
EMIR
EBA publishes validation requirements on initial margin models
On 6 July 2023, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published its final draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on Initial Margin Model Validation (IMMV) under EMIR.
These draft RTS set out the supervisory procedures to ensure the prudent use of initial margin models for OTC derivatives. In an accompanying Opinion, and as part of the ongoing negotiations on EMIR, the EBA calls on co-legislators to consider the establishment of a central validation function in the EU.
Inclusion of the United Arab Emirates on AML blacklist requires ESMA to withdraw the recognition decisions of three CCPs
On 25 July 2023, ESMA withdrew as required by EMIR the recognition decisions of the following three central counterparties (“CCPs”) established in the United Arab Emirates (including the Dubai International Financial Centre):
- Dubai Commodities Clearing Corporation;
- Dubai Clear LLC;
- Nasdaq Dubai Ltd.
This withdrawal follows the addition of the United Arab Emirates, by the European Commission, to the list of high-risk third countries presenting strategic deficiencies in their national anti-money laundering and counter financing of terrorism (“AML/CFT”) regime, on 16 March 2023.
In order to minimise potential market disruption, ESMA has provided for an adaptation period of three months. The withdrawal of recognition decisions will therefore enter into effect on 25 October 2023. From that date, the three CCPs concerned will no longer be permitted to provide clearing services to clearing members or trading venues established in the EU.
ESMA has also updated its list of recognised third-country central counterparties (TC CCPs).
FINANCIAL CRIME

EBA report on competent authorities approaches in the fight against financial crime
On 11 July 2023, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the findings from its 2022 review of competent authorities’ approaches to tackling money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) risks in the banking sector. For this Report, the EBA staff assessed 12 competent authorities from nine Member States.
Overall, the EBA’s findings suggest that supervisors are making progress in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. Some competent authorities in the EBA’s sample have made far-reaching changes in recent years, and their approach to Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing (AML/CFT) supervision of banks is now broadly effective.
Thanks to the EBA’s ongoing efforts to foster a holistic approach to AML/CFT, many competent authorities have made tangible progress in tackling ML/TF risks through prudential supervision and most are on track to embed cooperation and information exchange in their supervisory processes. Nevertheless, most supervisors in the 2022 sample were asked to do more to tackle ML/TF risk in their banking sector.
As it was the case in the previous rounds of reviews (2020, 2022), competent authorities find assessing ML/TF risk difficult. Several competent authorities in the 2022 sample did not use their ML/TF risk assessments to inform their supervisory strategy and inspection plans. A general lack of formalised processes and targeted training for AML/CFT and prudential supervisors meant that opportunities for intervening at an early stage, before risks crystallise, were sometimes missed. The EBA staff provided advice to competent authorities on the steps they should take to strengthen their approach.
The findings and recommended actions summarised in this report will be relevant to all competent authorities responsible for tackling ML/TF risks in credit and financial institutions across the single market and can help them in their ongoing effort to prevent the use of the EU financial system for ML/TF purposes.
EBA publishes fourth Opinion on money laundering and terrorist financing risks across the EU
On 13 July 2023, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published its fourth biennial Opinion on the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) affecting the European Union’s financial sector. It also sets out what competent authorities and EU co-legislators can do to mitigate those risks.
The EBA issues this Opinion against the background of a changed risk landscape, which has an impact on institutions’ anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) compliance and competent authorities’ approaches to supervision. Examples include geopolitical events like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and legislative developments, such as the publication of a comprehensive ‘AML Package’ and the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). They also include emerging risks such as corruption, and the laundering of proceeds from both environmental crime and cybercrime.
Some of the ML/TF risks identified in this Opinion, such as those associated with crypto assets, innovative financial services, the identification of beneficial owners and terrorist financing, had already been identified in previous Opinions on ML/TF risks and continue to be relevant today. Other risks that were highlighted in 2021, including those associated with Covid-19 and de-risking, are starting to decrease.
Awareness of ML/TF risks is increasing across all sectors under the EBA’s AML/CFT remit with small but tangible improvements in credit institutions and investment firms. At the same time, the AML/CFT systems and controls institutions have put in place are not always effective, with significant challenges in institutions’ approaches to transaction monitoring and reporting of suspicious transactions in particular.
AML/CFT supervision is improving overall, with more AML/CFT supervisors carrying out formal ML/TF risk assessments in line with EBA Guidelines. The frequency and intensity of supervisory engagement is increasing, with a small but tangible impact on levels of inherent and residual risk. Nevertheless, as highlighted in the EBA’s reports on ML/TF risk in payment institutions and on competent authorities’ approaches to the AML/CFT supervision of banks, AML/CFT supervision is not always commensurate to perceived levels of ML/TF risk or effective overall.
Cooperation of AML/CFT supervisors with other authorities has improved thanks to EBA initiatives such as AML/CFT Colleges, Supervisory Colleges, EBA’s Guidelines on cooperation and information exchange and relevant EBA prudential guidelines. This cooperation can be further improved with tax authorities for tax-related crimes.
FINTECH
ESMA seeks first input on detailed rules for crypto markets
On 12 July 2023, ESMA has published its first consultation package under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation and invites comments from stakeholders by 20 September 2023.
In this first of three consultation packages, ESMA is seeking input on proposed rules for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), in particular related to their authorisation, identification and management of conflicts of interests and also how CASPs should address complaints.
In addition, ESMA aims to gather more insight on respondents’ current and planned activities, as a fact-finding exercise to better understand the EU crypto-asset markets and their future development. These questions relate to elements such as the expected turnover of the respondents, the number of white papers they plan to publish and the use of on-chain vs off-chain trading. The input to this part of the consultation will remain confidential and will serve to calibrate certain proposals to be inserted in the second and third consultation package.
In parallel to this consultation, ESMA will continue working on its remaining mandates with the objective to publish a second consultation package in October 2023. More information regarding the ESMA approach to MiCA implementing measures can be found here.
ESMA will consider the feedback received to this consultation and expect to publish a final report and submit the draft technical standards to the European Commission for endorsement by 30 June 2024 at the latest.
FUNDS

UCITS and AIFs
ESMA report on marketing requirements and marketing communications under regulation on cross-border distribution of funds
On 3 July 2023, ESMA published its second report on national rules governing the marketing of investment funds under the regulation on cross-border distribution of funds.
The report provides an overview of the marketing requirements across Member States, and analyses the effects of national laws, regulations and administrative provisions governing the marketing communications for investment funds. The report is based on responses provided by NCAs to two questionnaires prepared by ESMA.
Key findings from the report include:
- the transposition of the directive on cross-border distribution of funds and the entry into force of the ESMA guidelines on funds’ marketing communications helped reach a greater level of harmonisation in areas where national divergences existed; and
- despite the powers NCAs have under the regulation, only a limited number of NCAs carried out any ex-ante verifications of marketing communications, while an increasing number of NCAs reported carrying out ex-post verifications.
ESMA will submit a new iteration of the report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in two years.
ESMA publishes 2022 UCITS and AIFMD sanction reports
On 18 July 2023, ESMA published its 2022 reports on use of sanctions under the UCITS Directive and AIFMD.
The reports set out an overview of the applicable legal framework, and information on the penalties and measures imposed by national competent authorities (NCAs) from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. Besides a limited number of NCAs issuing an increasing number of sanctions, the level of sanctions issued at national level remains stable and generally low, in particular when it comes to penalties.
Moving forward, ESMA will continue its work to foster supervisory convergence in terms of the application of the UCITS Directive and AIFMD, and to develop a common EU outcome-focused supervisory and enforcement culture.
The European Commission welcomes political agreement on enhanced regulatory framework for investment funds
On 20 July 2023, the European Commission welcomed the political agreement reached the day before between the European Parliament and the Council on the Commission’s proposal to improve the regulatory framework applicable to the EU investment funds industry, which the Commission adopted as part of the capital markets union (CMU) package presented on 25 November 2021. The capital markets union is the EU’s initiative to create a truly single market for capital across the EU. It aims to get investment and savings flowing across all member states for the benefit of citizens, businesses, and investors.
The reform is amending both the Directive on Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). It covers funds that are easily accessible to retail investors and those which are designed primarily for professional investors, such as private equity and hedge funds.
The revised regime harmonises the rules governing liquidity management tools, in line with international recommendations to support financial stability. It also increases transparency on the so-called “delegation rules”, by ensuring that supervisors are well-informed about the extent to which fund managers rely on expertise from third parties. Furthermore, the new rules establish a harmonised framework for funds that originate loans especially to companies in the EU, offering new funding opportunities to the real economy while safeguarding investor protection.
Other key components of the agreement include enhanced data sharing and cooperation between authorities, and new measures to identify undue costs that could be charged to funds, and hence their investors, as well as on preventing possible misleading names to better protect investors.
The agreement is provisional as it still needs to be confirmed by the Council and the Parliament before it can be formally adopted.
Money Market Funds Regulation
The European Commission report on the prudential and economic adequacy of the MMF Regulation
On 20 July 2023, the European Commission published a report on the adequacy of the Money Market Funds Regulation (MMF Regulation) on money market funds from a prudential and economic point of view.
The report shows that the MMF Regulation successfully passed the test of liquidity stress experienced by MMFs during the COVID-19 related market turmoil of March 2020, the recent interest rate increases, and related financial asset re-pricing. These observations indicate that the safeguards in the MMF Regulation have been working as intended. The report found that while the MMF Regulation has significantly strengthened the regulatory framework for MMFs in the EU, there were also some shortcomings which require further assessment, which show that there could be scope to further increase the resilience of EU MMFs – notably by decoupling the potential activation of liquidity management tools from regulatory liquidity thresholds.
SUSTAINABLE FINANCE
Sustainable finance
ESMA and NCAs to assess disclosures and sustainability risks in the investment fund sector
On 6 July 2023, ESMA launched a Common Supervisory Action (CSA) with National Competent Authorities (NCAs) on sustainability-related disclosures and the integration of sustainability risks.
The goal is to assess the compliance of supervised asset managers with the relevant provisions in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the Taxonomy Regulation and relevant implementing measures, including the relevant provision in the UCITS and AIFMD implementing acts on the integration of sustainability risks.
Using a common methodology developed by ESMA, NCAs will share knowledge and experiences on how to foster convergence in how they supervise sustainability related disclosure. Among the main objectives:
- to assess whether market participants adhere to applicable rules and standards in practice;
- to gather further information on greenwashing risks in the investment management sector; and
- to identify further relevant supervisory and regulatory intervention to address the issue.
Ensuring greater convergence in the supervision of risks stemming from incorrect and misleading disclosures is central to the effort to foster transparency and is identified as one of the Union Strategic Supervisory Priorities for NCAs. The CSA will promote this goal by improving the comprehensibility of ESG disclosures by asset managers across key segments of the sustainable finance value chain. In addition, the preliminary findings on the identification of greenwashing risks at entity and product level will provide input to ESMA’s Final Report on greenwashing.
In 2023 and until Q3 2024, NCAs will undertake their supervisory activities and share knowledge and experiences through ESMA to foster convergence in how they supervise sustainability-related disclosures and sustainability risk integration in asset managers.
The European Commission recommendation on facilitating finance for transition to a sustainable economy published in the Official Journal
On 7 July 2023, the European Commission published a recommendation aimed at supporting market participants that wish to obtain or provide transition finance by offering practical suggestions on how to approach transition finance.
The recommendation explains that transition finance should be understood as the financing of climate- and environmental performance improvements to transition towards a sustainable economy, at a pace that is compatible with the climate and environmental objectives of the EU.
The recommendation is addressed to undertakings that want to contribute to the transition to climate neutrality and environmental sustainability, while enhancing their competitiveness and are seeking finance for investments for this purpose.
It aims to explain the use of sustainable finance tools for this purpose. The recommendation is also addressed to: (i) financial intermediaries and investors that are willing to provide transition finance to undertakings; and (ii) Member States and financial supervisory authorities, to raise awareness of the topic and provide technical assistance, to encourage the uptake and provision of transition finance to the real economy.
ESMA provides insights into the expected sustainability disclosures in prospectuses
On 11 July 2023, ESMA issued a Public Statement on the sustainability disclosure expected to be included in prospectuses.
The statement sets out ESMA’s expectations on how the specific disclosure requirements of the Prospectus Regulation in relation to sustainability-related matters in equity and non-equity prospectuses should be satisfied considering the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) transition. This will help to:
- ensure that national competent authorities (NCAs) take a coordinated approach to the scrutiny of sustainability-related disclosure in prospectuses;
- provide issuers and their advisors with an understanding of the disclosure that NCAs will expect them to include in their prospectuses; and
- support investors’ ability to make an informed investment decision considering the importance of disclosure relating to sustainability-related matters.
Expected ESG disclosure in prospectuses
The Statement draws attention to the sustainability-related disclosure necessary to satisfy the relevant provisions of the Prospectus Regulation (PR).
ESMA emphasises the importance of an issuer’s non-financial reporting under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and the future sustainability reporting under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, especially because such disclosure may be material under the PR and included in an issuer’s prospectus.
In addition, regarding non-equity securities advertised as taking into account a specific ESG component or pursuing ESG objectives, the statement clarifies the disclosure required in relation to ‘use of proceeds’ bonds and ‘sustainability-linked’ bonds.
The Public Statement also notes that sustainability-related disclosure is sometimes included in advertisements but not in prospectuses themselves and highlights that this disclosure should be included in prospectuses if it is material under the PR.
ESMA and NCAs will continue to monitor the market to determine whether this guidance should be modified, for instance, in cases where new products are introduced to the market or there are changes in the legislation.
ESMA sustainable finance implementation timeline
On 3 August 2023, ESMA updated its sustainable finance implementation timeline for the SFDR, TR, CSRD, MIFID, IDD, UCITS and AIFMD. The timeline covers a number of implementation dates for measures under this legislation from 2021 until 2028. European Commission sustainable finance package.
Sustainability reporting
The European Commission adopts the European Sustainability Reporting Standards
On 31 July 2023, the European Commission adopted a Delegated Regulation supplementing the Accounting Directive as regards European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) for use by all companies subject to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The ESRS will be mandatory for use by companies that are obliged by the Accounting Directive to report certain sustainability information. By requiring the use of common standards, the Accounting Directive, as amended by the CSRD in 2022, aims to ensure that companies across the EU report comparable and reliable sustainability information.
The standards cover the full range of environmental, social, and governance issues, including climate change, biodiversity and human rights. They provide information for investors to understand the sustainability impact of the companies in which they invest. They also take account of discussions with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) in order to ensure a very high degree of interoperability between EU and global standards and to prevent unnecessary double reporting by companies.
The reporting requirements will be phased in over time for different companies.
CySEC DEVELOPMENTS

Circular C585: ESMA Guidelines on further specifying the circumstances for temporary restrictions in the case of a significant non-default event in accordance with Article 45a of EMIR
On 3 July 2023, CySEC issued Circular C585 which reminds Regulated Entities that that the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published the Guidelines on further specifying the circumstances for temporary restrictions in the case of a significant non-default event in accordance with Article 45a of EMIR (the ‘Guidelines’) on 2nd June 2023, translated in all official languages of the EU.
The Guidelines provide CySEC with guidance on the circumstances under which it should consider requiring the Central Counterparty (CCP) to refrain from undertaking certain restricted actions to protect their capital resources. The Guidelines identify indicators and elaborate on the circumstances prompting the consideration of whether to require the CCP to refrain from undertaking these actions. CySEC will therefore use these indicators to identify the cases in which it would be necessary for a restriction to apply.
CySEC has adopted these Guidelines by incorporating them into its supervisory practices and regulatory approach. The Guidelines shall be applicable from the 2nd of August 2023.
Circular C586: ESMA Guidelines on the application of the circumstances under which a central counterparty is deemed to be failing or likely to fail (Article 22(6) of CCPRRR)
On 3 of July 2023, CySEC issued Circular C586 which reminds Regulated Entities (CIFs, AIFMs and UCITS Management Companies) that ESMA has published the Guidelines on the application of the circumstances under which a central counterparty is deemed to be failing or likely to fail (Article 22(6) of CCPRRR).
The Guidelines apply to competent authorities and resolution authorities and aim to promote the convergence of supervisory and resolution practices regarding the application of the circumstances under which a central counterparty (CCP) is deemed to be failing or likely to fail.
Additionally, the Guidelines clarify the different circumstances under which a CCP is deemed to be failing or likely to fail, one of the three cumulative conditions set out in Article 22(1) of CCPRRR for triggering a resolution action. In particular, they aim to promote the convergence of supervisory and resolution practices with respect to how and when resolution should be triggered with respect to the circumstances under which a CCP is deemed to be failing or likely to fail. For these purposes, the guidelines list a set of objective elements that should support the determination that a CCP is failing or likely to fail, in accordance with the circumstances laid down in Article 22(3) of the CCPRRR.
ESMA has produced the final two guidelines (Guidelines 8 and 9) in accordance with Article 16(1) of the ESMA Regulation. It has issued these guidelines given the need to provide guidance on the consultation and information exchange between the Member State competent authority and the resolution authority for the purposes of making a determination if a CCP is failing or likely to fail.
CySEC has adopted these Guidelines by incorporating them into its supervisory practices and regulatory approach. The Guidelines are applicable from 1st of August 2023.
Circular C587: ESMA Guidelines on the consistent application of the triggers for the use of Early Intervention Measures (Article 18(8) of CCPRRR)
On 3 July 2023, CySEC issued Circular C587 to inform Regulated Entities that it has adopted the ESMA Guidelines on the consistent application of the triggers for the use of Early Intervention Measures (Article 18(8) of CCPRRR) (the “Guidelines”), published on June 1, 2023.
These Guidelines aim to provide guidance on the situations under which the application of early intervention measures to CCPs should be considered.
The Guidelines are applicable from 1st of August 2023.
Circular C588: EBA’s Opinion on the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) affecting the EU’s financial sector
On 18 July 2023, CySEC issued Circular C588 to inform the Regulated Entities that the European Banking Authority (‘EBA’) has published its fourth Opinion on the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) affecting the EU’s financial sector (the ‘Opinion’).
The Opinion constitutes an important source of information which Regulated Entities must consider when identifying and assessing ML/TF risks on the basis of section 58A of the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Laws of 2007- 2021, in order to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their AML/CFT systems and controls.
CySEC expects Regulated Entities to take due account of and consult the Opinion.
Circular C589: MONEYVAL’s report on money laundering and financing of terrorism risks in the world of virtual assets
On 18 July 2023, CySEC issued Circular C589 to inform the Regulated Entities that the MONEYVAL has published a Report on money laundering and financing of terrorism risks in the world of virtual assets (the ‘Report’).
The Report presents an overview of the money laundering and financing of terrorism risks in the world of virtual assets (VAs) and virtual asset service providers (VASPs). It also integrates and analyses data obtained from MONEYVAL members across multiple issues in relation to a variety of subjects such as:
- how members regulated the activity of issuance of VAs and the operation of VASPs
- the types of VA platforms used for financial support of criminal activity
- examples of cases investigated by the relevant authorities with a description of criminal schemes involving the VA elements that have been identified
- other data relevant to the goals of the study.
CySEC considers the Report to be of assistance to the Regulated Entities engaging or seeking to engage in VA activities, in understanding their AML/CFT risks and obligations and how they can effectively comply with these obligations.
Circular C590: Further guidance regarding prudential and remuneration reporting of CIFs via CySEC’s XBRL portal
On 21 July 2023, CySEC issued Circular C590 (following Circulars C546 and C576) to provide further guidance regarding the remuneration practices, gender pay gap and high earners submissions via CySEC’s XBRL portal.
Specifically, and as per the provision of the circular:
- CIFs can either submit directly on XBRL format or use the excel form taxonomies created by CySEC which can be found under the ‘Taxonomies’ section of the portal (Visualization file (custom language) should be used);
The new requirement for submission will appear under the open fillings section of the portal; - Where a CIF does not have any high earner during the year under review, it is not required to submit the respective template; and
- Even though the excel forms contains various tabs, CIFs should only complete the tabs mentioned in the Appendix of this Circular.
Further to the above, Circular C590 also provides further details regarding the new taxonomy with respect to the prudential reporting requirements as per the Article 54 of the Investment Firms Regulation.