INVESTMENT SERVICES & CAPITAL MARKETS

MIFID and MIFIR
ESMA launches selection of Consolidated Tape Provider for OTC derivatives
On 5 January 2026, ESMA launched the first selection procedure for the Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for over the counter (OTC) derivatives.
Entities interested to apply are encouraged to register and submit their requests to participate in the selection procedure by 11 February 2026.
The CTP aims to enhance market transparency and efficiency by consolidating post-trade data from data contributors, such as trading venues, into a single and continuous electronic stream. This consolidated view of market activity will help market participants to access accurate and timely information and make better-informed decisions, leading to more efficient price discovery and contributing to the Savings and Investment Union (SIU).
The CTP will collect and disseminate data on OTC derivatives based on the proposals in ESMA’s Final Report on transparency for derivatives.
ESMA will assess the received requests against the exclusion and selection criteria and will invite the successful candidates to submit their application. Any questions during the application period will be answered via the Portal.
ESMA intends to adopt a reasoned decision on the selected applicant by early July 2026. The successful applicant will be selected to operate the CTP for OTC derivatives for a period of five years and invited to apply for authorisation with ESMA. Once authorised, the CTP will be supervised by ESMA.
ESMA finalises technical standards on derivatives transparency and the OTC derivatives tape
On 15 December 2025, ESMA published the Final Report covering mandates under the MIFIR Review on derivatives trade transparency, package orders and the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives consolidated tape input and output data.
The proposed pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for exchange traded derivatives (ETDs) and OTC derivatives are designed to provide a high level of transparency whilst ensuring that liquidity providers are protected from undue risk. In the final proposals, ESMA has taken on board stakeholders’ feedback to streamline and improve the deferral regime initially proposed in the public consultation, in particular concerning equity ETDs and single-name credit default swaps. The regulatory technical standard (RTS) also ensures that the new deferral regime is in place ahead of the go live of the OTC derivatives consolidated tape (CTP).
The package order RTS has been adapted to the changes introduced to the transparency framework following the MIFIR review.
Regarding the mandate on data quality requirements for the consolidated tapes, the report includes a proposed amendment to the RTS on input and output data. This amendment outlines the list of fields to be transmitted to and disseminated by the OTC derivatives CTP and provides a clarification on the scope of the bonds CTP with respect to Exchange Traded Commodities/Exchange Traded Notes instruments.
The Simplification and Burden Reduction principle was applied by consolidating all derivative-related amendments into one review, setting a single application date across RTSs, removing transparency reporting to ESMA and using static thresholds which do not require annual updating and streamlining post-trade data.
The report has been submitted to the European Commission, that will now have three months to decide whether to endorse the proposed RTS. The new rules are expected to start applying on 1 March 2027.
ESMA selects EuroCTP to become the first Consolidated Tape Provider for shares and ETFs
On 19 December 2025, ESMA announced that it had selected EuroCTP as the first Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for shares and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the EU, in a step forward for the transparency of equity markets in the EU.
ESMA has decided to select EuroCTP following an in-depth assessment of its offer against the criteria listed in MIFID. EuroCTP met all the selection criteria and has demonstrated a solid approach towards ESMA’s overall expectations for the award criteria.
EuroCTP is a joint venture based in the Netherlands, with 15 European exchange groups as current shareholders.
ESMA is now inviting EuroCTP to apply for authorisation without delay. Following the authorisation, EuroCTP would operate the CTP for shares and ETFs for a period of five years under ESMA’s direct supervision in line with the MIFIR provisions currently in force
ESMA publishes 2024 data on cross-border investment activity of firms
On 22 December 2025, ESMA in cooperation with National Competent Authorities (NCAs), completed an analysis of the cross-border provision of investment services to retail clients, in the EU and EEA, in 2024.
Data was gathered from investment firms across 30 jurisdictions in the EU/EEA. The main findings include:
- Around370 financial firms provided cross-border services to retail clients.
- Approximately 10.5 million clients in the EU/EEA received investment services from firms located in other Member States.
- Compared to 2023:
- The number of firms decreased by 4%.
- The number of retail clients rose by 32%.
- Complaints increased by 46%.
- Cyprus leads as the primary location for firms providing cross-border investment services in the EU/EEA, accounting for 21% of passporting firms, followed by Luxembourg (15%) and Germany (13%).
- Germany, France, Spain, and Italy are the most significant destinations for retail clients receiving cross-border services in other Member States.
These insights will allow ESMA and the NCAs to better understand and monitor cross-border investment services provided by firms in the EU/EEA.
ESMA will perform the next data collection in 2026.
EMIR
ESMA maintains recognition of two UK central counterparties under EMIR
On 16 December 2025, ESMA confirmed it will maintain the recognition of LCH Limited and LME Clear Limited, two central counterparties (CCPs) established in the United Kingdom.
This decision is taken under Article 25(5)(b) of EMIR, that requires ESMA to assess if the conditions under which LCH Limited and LME Clear Limited were originally recognised continue to be met, considering recent regulatory, market, and business developments. Following its review, ESMA determined that maintaining the recognition of LCH Limited as Tier 2 CCP and LME Clear Limited as Tier 1 CCP is appropriate.
The decisions of ESMA regarding the determination of tiering and recognition of LCH Limited and LME Clear Limited remain applicable until 30 June 2028.
ICE Clear Europe Limited was not within the scope of this review, as its tiering and recognition were reviewed and confirmed in 2023.
Investor Protection
ESAs publish key tips to help consumers detect, prevent, and act on online frauds and scams
On 15 December 2025, the three European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA – ESAs) published two factsheets designed to help consumers protect themselves from crypto and other online frauds and scams and explain how fraudsters increasingly use artificial intelligence (AI) to deceive consumers.
To make the information easily accessible, the factsheets will be translated into all official EU languages and reproduced by national authorities. Fraud and scams are not new, but they have become much more sophisticated. Technologies like AI and blockchain make frauds and scams more convincing and harder to detect. For example, AI-generated voices or videos can impersonate friends or family members. The consequences for consumers can include financial loss, identity theft, and emotional distress.
The factsheets provide practical tips to help consumers recognise and avoid different types of frauds and scams. They explain common tricks scammers use – including phishing, impersonation, investment scams, and Ponzi schemes – and offer concrete real-world examples. Consumers will also find guidance on how to spot warning signs and recognise suspicious behaviours, messages, or offers.
Additionally, the factsheets advise consumers on steps to prevent fraud and scams, such as never sharing personal or banking information, always pausing to think before acting, and verifying the source of any messages received.
ESMA Opinion on the product intervention measures relating to turbos proposed by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
On 24 November 2025, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued an opinion on the product intervention measures proposed by the German Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) concerning the marketing, distribution and sale of turbo certificates to retail clients in Germany. Under Article 42 of MiFIR, national competent authorities may introduce such measures to address material investor protection concerns and must notify other NCAs and ESMA at least one month before the measures take effect. BaFin notified ESMA of its intention to implement national measures in October 2025 following a market study and consultation. The proposed measures would permanently restrict the retail sale of turbos by requiring a standardised risk warning, prohibiting monetary and non‑monetary benefits (including volume discounts), and introducing a mandatory knowledge test to ensure basic understanding of turbos before clients can acquire them. Turbos are defined as high‑risk leveraged financial instruments that immediately expire when a predefined knock‑out threshold is reached.
In its opinion, ESMA assessed whether the proposed measures were justified and proportionate, taking into account BaFin’s evidence on significant losses incurred by retail clients and the complexity and lack of transparency of turbos. ESMA concluded that the measures are justified and proportionate but expressed concerns that they may not fully address the identified investor protection risks, particularly given the absence of leverage limits. ESMA also recommended that BaFin closely monitor the impact of the measures, including retail investor outcomes, marketing practices and inducements, and assess whether additional steps may be needed. ESMA further encouraged other NCAs to continue monitoring turbo markets in their jurisdictions to identify similar risks and consider appropriate action.
Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)
European Commission proposes MAR amendments on market manipulation indicators and defines scope of new order data exchange mechanism
On 17 December 2025, the European Commission launched a consultation on a draft act amending the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/522 under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR).
The amendment delivers on two separate actions. The first is the European Commission mandate to adopt a delegated act establishing a list of designated trading venues that have a significant cross-border dimension for the purposes of exchanging order data in relation to certain financial instruments.
This derives from changes to MAR made by the EU Listing Act package, which introduced a new requirement (Article 25a) for national competent authorities to establish a mechanism to allow such exchange of order data and a Commission mandate to produce a list of designated venues.
The second is the European Commission empowerment to clarify indicators of market manipulation (Article 12(5)). The draft act accordingly amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/522 and (i) establishes a list of trading venues with a significant cross-border dimension by inserting a new Annex III, and (ii) updates the existing Annex II to clarify indicators of market manipulation in light of technical developments such as algorithmic trading.
The mechanism will be operational in two stages: by 5 June 2026 for shares; and by 5 June 2028 for bonds and futures. The draft follows ESMA’s technical advice consulted on in December 2024 and is intended to strengthen authorities’ ability to detect and enforce market abuse in an increasingly complex trading environment. The deadline for comments is 14 January 2026.
ESMA updates its Q&As
On 19 December 2025, ESMA published that updated the following Q&As:
Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR)
EBA final draft RTS on threshold and prudential risk management requirements under CSDR
On 16 December 2025, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published its final draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) establishing the threshold up to which- non-banking central securities depositories (CSDs) (“designating CSDs”) may use banking CSDs or credit institutions for cash settlement without entities needing additional authorisation.
Key features of the RTS include:
- Threshold levels: the minimum threshold level is set at EUR 3.75 billion and 1.5% of annual settlement volume, while the maximum threshold is EUR 6.25 billion and 2.5% of annual settlement volume.
- Dynamic thresholds: the standards introduce aa dynamic threshold that adjusts according to the risk profile of both the designating CSD and the designated credit institution. As activity levels increase, so do the prudential and risk management requirements.
- Accompanying risk management and prudential measures: proportionate to the threshold
PRIIPs
Table of Member State language and ex ante notification requirements for the PRIIPs KID
On the 5th of December 2025, the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities issued an update providing an overview of the language and ex ante notification requirements for the Key Information Document (KID) for Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) across EU Member States. In accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014, the KID must be written in an official language of the Member State where the PRIIP is distributed, or in another language accepted by the competent authority of that Member State. Under Article 5(2) of the PRIIPs Regulation, Member States may require PRIIP manufacturers or distributors to submit the KID to the national competent authority prior to marketing.
The accompanying table provides clarity on these requirements across Member States, including links to relevant national legislation or guidance where available. It addresses additional, Member State-specific notification obligations under Article 5(2) and does not include the general UCITS KID notification requirement under Article 82 of Directive 2009/65/EC, which applies uniformly across all Member States. The table was initially published in July 2024 and was last updated in December 2025. Where ex ante notification is not required in a Member State, the relevant field is left blank.
ESMA updated its consolidated Q&As on the PRIIPs Key Information Document
On the 5th of December 2025, the European Supervisory Authorities updated their consolidated questions and answers on the PRIIPs key information document which now features seven additional questions/answers.
These sections of the Q&As have been updated with answers to the following questions:
- General topics:
- If a product, linked to a single ISIN code, is available in both the single and recurring premium versions, it is possible to provide a representation of the riskier version of the two by reporting in the other relevant information section the possibility of purchasing the other version of the product?
- Market risk assessment – product categories:
- Could you confirm if products with recurring premiums are to be modelled as Category 2 PRIIPs or Category 3 PRIIPs? Our opinion is that they should be modelled as category 3 because their performance does not depend only on the performance of the underlying at RHP. However, in the case in which a manufacturer shall produce KIDs for PRIIPs available as both single and recurring premium versions, it may lead to KIDs that are not comparable, mainly given to modelling assumptions (for example, the different lengths of the data series for Category 2 and 3 PRIIPs).
- Performance scenarios:
- In life annuities, should the sum of rents paid up to the period be considered in the minimum scenario?
- Could you confirm that for what concerns the calculation of performance scenarios, as specified in Annex IV, point 7, the manufacturer must always use monthly data even if the NAV is available at higher frequencies (i.e., daily or weekly)?
- In Annex IV, Case 3 for PRIIPs referred to in point 1 of Annex VIII without sufficient historical data and with no benchmark, or with a benchmark without sufficient historical data, or any other Category 2 PRIIPs. In point 13 it is said to use a benchmark regulated by Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Is not that a contradiction? In point 15 it is said that in the case in which there is not an appropriate benchmark or proxy with sufficient historical data which meets the criteria set out in point 5 of this Annex for the PRIIP, performance scenarios shall be calculated in accordance with points 21 to 27 of this Annex using 15 years of historical returns of the PRIIP or an appropriate benchmark or proxy.
- Does that mean we are to treat the PRIIP as a Category 3 product?
- It seems contradictory that the regulation is asking to calculate performance scenarios in accordance with points 21 to 27 with 15 years of historical returns, when we have not been able to obtain 10 years historical data, either from the actual product or its appropriate benchmark
- If we do not have sufficient data to meet the amended performance scenario calculations, may we treat the PRIIP as Category 1 according to the definition in Annex II, point 4(c). Accordingly, its Moderate, Favourable and Unfavourable performance scenarios should be “reasonable and conservative best estimates of the expected values”. If yes, we would like to clarify if the SRI calculation should be set at a “6” in the case where the product may have sufficient data for SRI calculation (e.g., 5 years monthly), but insufficient data for performance scenario calculation (e.g., 10 years historical returns not available).
- Multi-option products:
- Could you confirm if manufacturers of insurance-based investment products are allowed to signpost to KIDs produced by fund managers instead of proper SIDs in their IBIP MOPs? What happens when the RHP of the insurance product is not compatible with the RHP of the underlying fund?
- Investment funds:
- In the case of an investment fund (UCITS or AIF), can the manufacturer of the PRIP be an entity to which collective portfolio management functions, or other functions, have been delegated to by the fund or by the management company (manager) or alternative investment fund manager of the fund (those entities to which functions have been delegated might, for example, be referred to as the fund promoter, sponsor, etc.)?
OPERATIONAL RESILIENCE
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
ESAs advise against extending DORA to statutory auditors and audit firms
On 17 December 2025, the European Supervisory Authorities (the ESAs being the European Banking Authority, European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and European Securities and Markets Authority) published a joint report (dated 4 December) responding to the European Commission’s request under Article 58(3) of DORA.
The report assesses whether statutory auditors and audit firms should be subject to strengthened digital operational resilience requirements by means of inclusion in the scope of DORA or by means of amendments to the Statutory Audit Directive. While acknowledging the critical role that auditors play in financial stability and the fact that confidentiality, integrity and availability of information accessed during audits is critical, the report clarifies that audit activities do not form part of the operational value chain of the auditee and therefore do not directly affect the continuity of financial or other services.
The ESAs conclude that the identified negative implications of the application of DORA to statutory auditors and audit firms such as increased fixed costs, limiting audit choice, increased audit fees and significant re-skilling of national audit oversight authorities, appear to outweigh the potential benefits. Therefore, including statutory auditors and audit firms within DORA’s scope is not warranted at this stage.
DIGITAL FINANCE
Markets In Crypto-Assets Regulation (MICA)
ESMA updates its Q&As
On 19 December 2025, ESMA published that it updated the following Q&As:
FUNDS
UCITS and AIFMD
ESMA report on amended guidelines on Liquidity Management Tools of UCITS and open-ended AIFs
On 18 December 2025, ESMA published a report with amended guidelines on liquidity management tools (LMTs) of Undertakings for UCITS and open-ended Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs).
The amendments aim to align with the regulatory technical standards (RTS) adopted by the European Commission on 17 November [see MAP S.Platis December 2025 Regulatory Roundup]. To ensure consistency between the guidelines and the RTS, ESMA has made some targeted amendments to the guidelines in two areas:
- the inclusion of investor-level redemption gates to mitigate first-mover advantage, and
- the calculation of implicit transaction costs for anti-dilution LMTs, which should only be considered where appropriate to the fund’s investment strategy and estimated on a best-effort basis.
The guidelines will be translated into all official EU languages and published on ESMA’s website. National competent authorities will have two months to notify ESMA on whether they comply or intend to comply with the guidelines. The updated guidelines will apply from the RTS application date (which is specified as 16 April 2026), with a 12-month transitional period for existing funds.
ESMA updates its Q&As
On 19 December 2025, ESMA published that updated the following Q&As:
- AIFMD: Exclusion related to UNGC/OECD Guidelines(2734)
- UCITS Directive: Exclusion related to UNGC/OECD Guidelines (2733)
SUSTAINABLE FINANCE
Omnibus package
European Parliament approves provisional agreement on Omnibus I simplification package
On 16 December 2025, the European Parliament announced it had approved a provisional agreement between MEPs and EU governments on updated sustainability reporting and due diligence rules for companies.
The revamped rules will apply to fewer companies and reduce some obligations for firms. This proposes targeted amendments to, amongst other things, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D), aimed at reducing administrative burdens for businesses. The EU has already published Directive (EU) 2025/794 which implemented the “stop-the-clock” proposal, postponing the application date of certain requirements of the CSRD and CS3D.
In relation to CS3D, key areas of agreement include:
- reducing the scope of due diligence on adverse impacts requirements by increasing the thresholds to 5000 employees and EUR1.5 billion net turnover;
- broader and more flexible provisions around identification and assessment of adverse impacts;
- removal of the obligation for companies to adopt a climate transition plan;
- a maximum penalty cap of 3% of the company’s net worldwide turnover, with guidance to be provided by the European Commission and member states; and
- postponement of the transposition deadline to 26 July 2028 (meaning companies will have to comply with the new measures by July 2029).
The final text will have to be formally approved by Council, too. The directive will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal.
Sustainable Finance
ESMA reviews impact of Guidelines on ESG or sustainability related terms in fund names
On 17 December 2025, released research assessing the impact of its fund naming guidelines on ESG and sustainability-related terms.
The study found that ESMA’s Guidelines have:
- Improved consistency in the use of ESG terms by increasing alignment of fund names and their actual investment strategies.
- Enhanced investor protection by reducing greenwashing risks.
Drawing on nearly 1,000 shareholder notifications in reaction to the guidelines from the 25 largest EU asset managers with EUR 7.5 trillion in assets under management, the study found that:
- 64% of the funds mentioned in shareholder notifications changed their name, in most cases to avoid the use of ESG related terminology.
- 56% updated their investment policies to strengthen their sustainability focus.
The study then focuses on the impact of the fossil-fuel related exclusions on 4,000 EU funds using ESG terminology in their names, with EUR 2 trillion in assets under management. The analysis shows that:
- Funds with higher fossil fuel exposures were more likely to remove ESG terms from their names, underscoring how portfolio composition influences compliance choices.
- Since the publication of the guidelines, funds retaining ESG terms in their names have reduced their portfolio share of fossil fuel holdings more than all other funds, suggesting efforts to green their portfolios.
A webinar to present the findings will take place on 20 January at 10.00. Please register by 19 January at 12:00.
ESMA remains committed to monitoring fund naming trends and tracking how the market evolves in response to its Guidelines, while engaging with the European Commission to support evidence-based policymaking on ESG and sustainable finance regulation.
ESG Ratings Activities Regulation
ESMA updates its Q&As
On 19 December 2025, ESMA published that updated the following Q&As:
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities Regulation
- Group-affiliated small ESG rating providers(2737)
- ESMA assessment of temporary regime notification(2738)
- Content of temporary regime notification(2739)
- Small ESG rating provider no longer meeting temporary regime size requirements(2740)
Taxonomy
European Commission issues draft guidance on simplified EU taxonomy reporting rules
On 17 December 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance to assist with preparing for the simplified EU Taxonomy disclosure rules, under the EU Taxonomy for sustainable economic activities, which apply from January 2026.
These rules, introduced through the Omnibus Taxonomy Delegated Act adopted in July, aim to significantly reduce reporting burdens for EU businesses. Key changes include the removal of requirements for companies to assess non-material activities, streamlined reporting templates with up to 89% fewer data points for financial undertakings and 66% fewer for non-financial undertakings, and simplified key performance indicators for financial institutions.
The guidance, presented as FAQs, provides early interpretation and practical advice ahead of firms preparing their first annual Taxonomy reports under the new framework, due in 2026 for the 2025 financial year.
Formal adoption of the FAQs in all EU languages is expected in Q1 2026, following the publication of the Omnibus Taxonomy Delegated Act in the Official Journal of the European Union.
EU RETAIL INVESTMENT STRATEGY
Retail investment strategy package
The Council and the European Parliament agree on an updated retail investment framework
On 18 December 2025, the Council of the EU and the European Parliament reached a provisional political agreement on an updated retail investment strategy package to empower and protect consumers and increase competitiveness in the EU’s financial markets.
The package takes the form of a directive containing targeted amendments to a number of other EU directives in the area of financial services such as the markets in financial instruments directive (MIFID), the Solvency II directive, the directive for undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) and the alternative investment and managers directive (AIFMD), and a regulation amending the packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs Regulation).
The Council of the EU and European Parliament confirm that agreement has been reached in the following areas:
- Value for money – firms must identify and quantify all costs borne by investors related to the investment products they advise. Products failing to offer value for money should not be released onto the market and sold to retail customers, and who should be able to compare investment products’ costs, charges, performance and non-financial benefits.
- Inducements – a new test will be introduced to ensure firms act in the clients’ best interests, enabling them to distinguish inducements from other fees.
- Investment advice – advisers must ensure that products and services are suitable for clients’ needs by assessing factors such as knowledge, experience, financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives.
- Client journey – advisers providing recommendations to consumers related to diversified, non-complex, cost-efficient instruments, will no longer need to assess clients’ knowledge and experience as part of the suitability assessment. More retail investors will be permitted to be treated as professional clients, provided they satisfy criteria concerning their investment experience.
- Financial literacy and financial influencers – member states must promote the financial literacy and education of customers on the responsible purchase of investment and insurance product tailored to specific groups, including younger investors. Firms using financial influencers to market products, or contracts, must have written agreements with them, their contact details and have control over their activities.
The provisional agreement now needs to be approved by both the European Parliament and Council before the new rules can enter into force. Technical work will continue to finalise the legal texts early in 2026. Member states will have to transpose the new rules 24 months following their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. They will start applying 30 months following their publication, except for the new rules under PRIIPs which would start applying 18 months following publication.
CySEC DEVELOPMENTS

Circular C738: European Commission’s request for Feedback by the public regarding the Draft Implementing Regulation on formats for submitting beneficial ownership information to the central registers of beneficial owners referred to in Article 10 of the Directive (EU) 2024/1640
On 1 December 2025, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) issued Circular C738, to inform the Regulated Entities of the following:
The European Commission requested Feedback from the public regarding the Draft Implementing Regulation on formats for submitting beneficial ownership information referred to in Article 62 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 to the central registers of beneficial owners established under Article 10 of the Directive (EU) 2024/1640. This Draft Implementing Regulation was open for feedback for 4 weeks (Feedback period: 26 November 2025 – 24 December 2025) and was taken into account when finalising this initiative. In order to contribute, stakeholders needed to register or login using their existing social media account by clicking here. All contributions received were published here following the end of the feedback period.
The European Commission’s Draft Implementing Regulation on formats for submitting beneficial ownership information and its Annexes were attached in Annex A and B of this Circular, respectively. CySEC encouraged the Regulated Entities to submit their feedback on the Draft Implementing Regulation.
Circular C740 & Circular C747: Data collection for onboarding of financial and non-financial counterparties subject to the obligation to apply for authorisation and validation for their initial margin models in accordance with Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (‘EMIR’)
On 12 December 2025, CySEC issued Circular C740 along with the clarifying Circular C747, to inform Regulated Entities that the European Banking Authority (EBA) launched a formal data-collection exercise through competent authorities to identify all EU counterparties required to apply for validation of their ISDA Standard Initial Margin Models (“ISDA SIMM”). This circular relates to EMIR 3 amendments.
To recap, Financial Counterparties and specific Non-Financial Counterparties above the clearing thresholds (collectively the “Entities”), after EMIR 3 came into effect (24 Dec. 2024) need to seek authorisation from their Competent Authorities prior to making any changes to their proprietary initial margin models or prior to applying new models. Moreover, Entities that apply a pro-forma initial margin model (such as the ISDA-SIMM) need to validate the said model with the EBA.
With the issuance of Circular C740, CySEC is requesting from Cyprus based Entities to submit the requisite data for validating their pro-forma models with the EBA. Entities that do not apply pro-forma models do not need to take any actions, but as already mentioned need to seek authorisation from CySEC if they have implemented a new IM model or changed an existing IM model after the 24th of December 2024.
Reporting
Entities that either:
- implemented a new IM model or changed an existing IM model after the 24th of December 2024 must apply for authorisation from CySEC under the no-action regime introduced by the no-action letter.
- deploy the ISDA SIMM must apply to CySEC for authorisation of their model. Without CySEC authorisation, entities will not be eligible to seek EBA validation of their ISDA SIMM models in 2026.
Entities that do not fall a) or b) above are not required to take actions.
Therefore, by 16 January 2026, Regulated Entities must submit:
- The data set out in the Annex to the EBA opinion on the application of EMIR with respect to initial margin models with subject “EMIR IMM application for authorisation_LEI of Regulated Entity”, and
- The data set out in the template which can be found here with the file name “EMIR IMM validation_LEI of Regulated Entity.xlsx”. It is noted that the above file name must be repeated in the email subject line.
The above information should be provided to CySEC through the email address emir@cysec.gov.cy.The validation data will be forwarded to the EBA for onboarding onto its ISDA SIMM Validation System and processed under the EBA’s confidentiality regime.
Next Steps
CySEC urges Entities to take the necessary action in order to ensure compliance with their EMIR obligations at all times. Entities that do not submit the information requested under will not be allowed to onboard onto the EBA’s ISDA SIMM Validation System. Non-onboarded entities will not be in the position to apply to the EBA for validation of their ISDA-SIMM based internal margin models thereby failing to comply with their obligations under EMIR.
EBA’s no-action letter in relation to the processing of applications for IM model authorisation remains otherwise in force.
Circular C741: Shortening of the standard securities settlement cycle in the European Union (T+1)
On 12 December 2025, CySEC issued Circular C741, following Circular C702 in relation to the shortening of the standard securities settlement cycle in the European Union (‘EU’). Through this Circular, CySEC draws the attention of Regulated Entities to recent developments on the matter.
Regulation (EU) 2025/2075 amending Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 introduces a shorter settlement cycle in the European Union, a T+1 settlement cycle for transactions in transferable securities executed on trading venues, aligning the EU with other major global markets and aiming to enhance settlement efficiency, reduce counterparty risk and improve capital market competitiveness. The Regulation will apply from 11 October 2027.
Certain transactions fall outside the scope of the T+1 requirement, including:
- Privately negotiated trades executed on a trading venue.
- Bilateral trades reported to a trading venue.
- The first transaction where the securities are subject to initial recording in book-entry form under Article 3(2) of CSDR.
- Certain securities financing transactions (SFTs) — such as securities lending and borrowing — only if they are documented as single transactions composed of two linked operations
Additionally:
- Margin lending transactions are outside the scope of the T+1 settlement cycle requirement because they are not transactions in transferable securities.
CySEC urges regulated entities to begin assessing the operational, technological or procedural challenges of the transition and strongly encourages participation in the first readiness survey, which will be open on homepage of the EU T+1 Industry Committee website until 19 December 2025, to support a smooth and coordinated market transition.
Circular C743: Application of the requirement of Directive (EU) 2024/927 concerning Liquidity Management Tools – Amendment of regulations or statutory documents and partnership agreements
On 19 December 2025, CySEC issued Circular C743, to inform regulated entities of the requirements introduced by Directive (EU) 2024/927 (the ‘Directive’).
Directive (EU) 2024/927 amends:
- Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM Directive – ‘AIFMD’), which has been transposed into national law by the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Law (Law 56(I)/2013); and
- Directive 2009/65/EC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS Directive – ‘UCITSD’)
The Directive introduces, in Annex V to the AIFMD and Annex IIA to the UCITSD respectively, a harmonised list of the following nine (9) Liquidity Management Tools (LMTs):
- Suspension of subscriptions, repurchases, and redemptions
- Redemption gate
- Extension of notice periods
- Redemption fee
- Swing pricing
- Dual pricing
- Anti-dilution levy
- Redemption in kind
- Side-pockets
Under the amended rules, AIFMs managing open-ended AIFs and UCITS Management Companies (as well as self-managed UCITS and AIFs) must select and incorporate at least two suitable LMTs from options (2) – (8) and include them into each fund’s rules or instruments of incorporation (for more detailed information kindly refer to the Circular). Please note that an AIFM/UCITS Management Companies cannot select tools 5 and 6 only. Moreover, for any AIF/UCITS which is a money market fund pursuant to regulation 2017/1131 can selected only tool from the points 2-8 above.
In view of the above, CySEC urges the relevant stakeholders to take the necessary steps to amend the rules, incorporation documents, or partnership agreements of open-ended AIFs and UCITS so that, as of 16 April 2026, they are in compliance with the obligations set out in Articles 1(8) and 2(6) of Directive (EU) 2024/927, which will be transposed into national law.
Specifically, by 27 February 2026, the following actions are required:
- AIFMs, for each open-ended AIF they manage that is established as an investment company, common fund, or limited partnership, must submit the relevant application to CySEC, pursuant to Articles 51(4)(a), 60(1)(a), or 70(1)(a) of the Alternative Investment Funds Law of 2018;
- Internally managed open-ended AIFs must submit a relevant notification to CySEC, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Law 56(I)/2013;
- UCITS Management Companies, for each UCITS they manage established as a Variable Capital Investment Company (VCIC), must submit a relevant notification to CySEC, pursuant to Article 37(1) of Law 78(I)/2012;
- UCITS established as VCICs that have not appointed a management company must submit a relevant notification to CySEC, pursuant to Article 37(1) of Law 78(I)/2012;
- UCITS Management Companies, for each UCITS they manage established as a common fund, must jointly with the Depositary of the UCITS submit a relevant notification to CySEC, pursuant to Article 26(3) of Law 78(I)/2012;
In all the above cases, the notification or application must be submitted in order to amend the rules, incorporation documents or partnership agreement of the relevant open-ended AIF or UCITS, to include at least two (2) appropriate liquidity management tools (LMTs) selected from those listed in points (2) to (8) above (see Annex II for AIFs and Annex IV for UCITS to Directive (EU) 2024/927).
The applications/notifications must be accompanied by:
- A relevant confirmation issued by the AIFM / the UCITS Management Company / the Investment Company with Variable Capital (if no Management Company has been appointed), stating that the appropriateness of the selected liquidity management tools (LMTs) has been assessed in relation to the intended investment strategy, the liquidity profile, and the redemption policy of the open-ended AIF/UCITS, to confirm compliance with their respective obligations; and
- The applicable fee, as specified in:
- the Directive on the Payable Fees and Annual Contributions of UCITS, AIFs and Management Companies of 2012 to 2023, or
- the Directive on the Payable Fees and Annual Contributions of AIFs and their Managers.
CySEC Consultation Paper on a new Directive for the submission of prudential supervisory information by Crypto-Asset Service Providers
On 19 December 2025, CySEC issued a Consultation Paper proposing a new Directive on the submission of prudential information by Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs), in the context of Article 67 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCAR).
The proposed Directive introduces periodic reporting requirements to CySEC, including the submission of prudential information under MiCAR, financial reports (trial balance, balance sheet, and profit and loss statement), and audited annual financial statements. The framework aims to support CySEC’s supervisory oversight and verify CASPs’ compliance with MiCAR prudential requirements.
The proposed reporting regime aligns with the prudential reporting framework applicable to Investment Firms and follows submission deadlines consistent with existing EU implementing regulations, ensuring streamlined and timely supervisory reporting.
The consultation applies to CASPs authorised by CySEC under Article 63 of MiCA. It does not apply to central securities depositories, CIFs, market operators, management companies, or AIFMs providing crypto-asset services under notification, as these entities are exempt from the relevant prudential supervision requirements.
Circular C746: Suspension of redemption of UCITS and AIF units on 24 December 2025
On 22 December 2025, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) issued Circular C746, to inform Regulated Entities that the redemption of UCITS and AIF units is suspended on 24 December 2025. It is provided that the suspension refers to UCITS and AIFs that hold assets in transferable securities listed on regulated markets and whose net asset value is calculated on a daily basis.
CySEC reached the above decision after taking into consideration the below:
- Article 20(1) of the Open-ended Undertakings for Collective Investment Law,
- Article 43(3) of the Alternative Investment Funds Law,
- The fact that 24 December 2025 is a public holiday (Christmas Eve) in most international stock markets, and
- The need to safeguard the interests of unit-holders of UCITS and AIFs and the proper functioning of the market.
It is noted that the obligations under article 20(2) of the UCI Law and article 43 of the AIF Law continue to apply.
CySEC Press Release on MiCA licence applications due by 27 February 2026
On 23 December 2025, CySEC issued a Press Release to remind Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) operating in the Republic that the deadline for applying for authorisation under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is 27 February 2026.
Following CySEC’s announcement dated 17 October 2024 and Circular C674, it is clarified that CASPs currently providing services under the national framework may continue their activities until their application is approved or rejected or, in any event, until the end of the transitional period on 1 July 2026, whichever occurs first.
CASPs that do not apply for authorisation by the above deadline are required to submit a wind down plan, as the provision of crypto-asset services will no longer be permitted after the end of the transitional period. Any continuation of activities beyond 1 July 2026 is conditional upon obtaining the relevant MiCA authorisation. At the same time, it is recalled that the cross-border provision of services to another EU Member State is permitted only where this is allowed under the national legislation of the host Member State and to the extent that the grandfathering regime has been adopted, in line with relevant ESMA guidance.
CASPs that remain registered in the relevant Register continue to be subject to all obligations arising both from the national rules and from Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, as previously announced by CySEC.
CySEC emphasises that a smooth transition to the MiCA framework is a key prerequisite for enhancing confidence, transparency and security in the crypto-asset market.
CySEC Press Release for Public Consultation on amendments to the Financial Conglomerates Directive
On 23 December 2025, CySEC has published a Consultation Paper proposing amendments to the CySEC Financial Conglomerates Directive (DI 87-12) to align national legislation with EU requirements on the European Single Access Point (ESAP).
The proposed changes transpose Directive (EU) 2023/2864 and aim to ensure that certain information disclosed by Investment Firms, Asset Management Companies and AIFMs of the Republic that are part of a financial conglomerate is made available on ESAP, the EU’s centralised digital access point for financial and sustainability information.
